Re: Regarding Implicit AND's

Richard Fikes <pwtc!fikes@labrea.stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 90 13:27 PDT
From: Richard Fikes <pwtc!fikes@labrea.stanford.edu>
Subject: Re:  Regarding Implicit AND's
To: interlingua@vaxa.isi.edu
Cc: pwtc!Fikes@labrea.stanford.edu
Included-Msgs: <9007182012.AA18893@tc.pw.com>,
               The message of 18 Jul 90 12:48 PDT from labrea!allegra!rjb@research.att.com
Message-id: <19900718202731.1.FIKES@peso.tc.pw.com>
    From: labrea!allegra!rjb@research.att.com
    Date: Wed, 18 Jul 90 12:48 PDT
    Original-From: allegra!rjb (Ron Brachman)
    To: research!labrea.stanford.edu!uucp!pwtc!fikes@[131.209.1.10]
    Subject: Re:  Regarding Implicit AND's

    I agree with you wholeheartedly.  Get rid of implicit connectives -
    they're dangerous.