Re: Hayes' scrutiny of Top 40

Piek Vossen (Piek.Vossen@let.uva.nl)
Mon, 11 May 1998 17:22:24 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Previous message: Piek Vossen: "Top 40"

At 08:07 PM 5/7/98 -0700, Robert Spillers wrote:
>I agree. The lexicon is an excellent idea.
>
>So... what features should it have? How will it interface with an ontology.
>What function(s) should be emphasized - information retrieval, machine
>translation, inferencing, etc? Can it be tuned to a specific purpose - by what
>technique?

I will try to work this out for the workshop in two ways. First of all,
there is our paper for LREC/ Granada which discusses hyponymy from different
perspectives (ontologies and wordnets), secondly, I will try to broaden the
issue to the interface between the lexicon and the ontology in general. This
will include questions such as the ones you suggest above.

Best,

Piek.
Piek Vossen
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Spuistraat 134
1012 VBAmsterdam
The Netherlands

tel. +31 20 525 4669
fax. +31 20 525 4429

Previous message: Piek Vossen: "Top 40"