Re: Resolution of SQL email@example.com (Gio Wiederhold)
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 92 17:14:15 EST
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Gio Wiederhold)
Message-id: <9201092214.AA10414@ next65.darpa.mil >
To: email@example.com (Kenneth Forbus)
Subject: Re: Resolution of SQL debate
Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org,
email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com,
firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
You are right that we are not ready to set standards.
But I consider that we are ready to discuss standards, promote
experiments, evaluations, and testbeds for proposals towards
And then we must build community support -- in a fragmented world.
None of us, I think, considers themselves a standards committee in
This a process that did nor occurr with SQL1 (except for IBM's
implementation of SEQUEL) or SQL2.