You answered; they didn't (Fritz Lehmann)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 93 03:25:06 CDT
From: (Fritz Lehmann)
Message-id: <>
Subject: You answered; they didn't

>>Dear Pat Hayes,    
>>        When an email message gets no answer I 
>>never know whether it was too boring, too lame to warrant a 
>>response, or too convincing to question.  

>Im sorry: I thought I had replied to all your messages. Please forgive my
>rudeness if I did not. A proper reply to this one will take a little longer
>but it will come. 

>Pat Hayes

>PS it may of course be that the point it makes is so convincing that
>everyone is left speechless.  :-)

Ah NO, NO-- Pat, you've answered my mail!  I didn't mean you.  I was talking

about the KIF/CG Powers That Be who have not presented their good reasons for

limiting KIF and CG to being pure First Order rather than higher- and mixed-
order.  Sorry for the ambiguity.  It must be as described in your PS.  I keep

coming up with new things one might want to say in AI which (I think) aren't

expressible in First Order .

                                        Fritz Lehmann